You know what? I thought about getting reviewed. I haven't decided if I've changed my mind yet. It's funny how some of them have their little rules about what you can and cannot do in your diary.

"No typing like this."
"No gangster talk bla bla."

Wow....I understand that you are reviewing that person's diary. And in reviewing that person's diary, you are reviewing their PERSONAL content. I mean seriously, a diary is for your personal thoughts, correct? So if one day you say you feel like icin' a motherfucker because he was in ya grill piece, then I feel it's your personal right to say so. I mean, some people just talk the way they write. Not everyone speaks perfect english. I mean damn, you would think you could get a break in your diary.

Okay, and when you review someone it's your personal opinion about their site, correct? Okay, then if you don't like something about someone's site then you should just say so. I don't think you should dismiss someone right off the bat for certain things. But I do understand that if certain things get outta control just be like, "No, I can't understand you, you get a 0." From the reviewers perspective you want to review a diary that appeals to you visually and contextually (I so don't even know if that's a word). So if someone writes so horribly that no one can understand and it's just ridiculous, I understand perfectly. Because the person that submitted their site should make sure people can read it for the most part, I guess, but without sacrificing their true selves.

Bottom line: If/when I get reviewed, reviewers will see all sides of me: my angry, my sad, my proper, my slang, my everything. And if they can't deal with it, then too bad. I get a bad score and move on with my life.

back _and_ forth